BR Vs. Normal Battlefield Challenges: Player Choice?

by Admin 53 views
BR vs. Normal Battlefield Challenges: Player Choice?

Hey guys! Have you ever felt stuck with challenges in a game that force you to play a mode you don't really enjoy? It's a common frustration, especially in games with both a Battle Royale (BR) mode and a more traditional, normal battlefield experience. The core of the issue often boils down to player choice and flexibility. We're talking about the challenges that are designed to push you, but sometimes they push you in a direction you'd rather not go. Let's dive into why giving players the option to complete challenges in either BR or normal battlefield modes is a win-win for everyone involved.

The Frustration of Forced Playstyles

Let's be real, not everyone loves Battle Royale, and not everyone loves the more traditional modes. Some players thrive in the high-stakes, last-person-standing environment of BR, while others prefer the strategic, objective-based gameplay of a normal battlefield. When challenges are designed without considering these preferences, it can lead to frustration and a feeling of being forced into a playstyle that doesn't suit you. This frustration can manifest in several ways:

  • Reduced enjoyment: If you're slogging through a mode you dislike just to complete a challenge, you're probably not having a great time. This can lead to burnout and a decreased desire to play the game overall.
  • Suboptimal performance: When you're not enjoying yourself, your performance can suffer. You might be less engaged, less focused, and less likely to play your best.
  • Negative impact on team dynamics: In team-based modes, forcing players into situations they don't want to be in can create tension and friction within the team. Nobody wants to be the teammate who's clearly just going through the motions.

The main keyword here is player choice. We're not saying challenges should be easy; we're saying they should be doable in a way that respects the player's preferred style. Think about it: a challenge that requires you to get a certain number of sniper kills might be a breeze for a BR player who loves long-range engagements, but it could be a real pain for someone who prefers the close-quarters combat of a normal battlefield. The solution? Let players choose where they want to tackle the challenge.

The Benefits of Choice: A Win-Win Scenario

Giving players the option to complete challenges in either BR or normal battlefield modes isn't just about alleviating frustration; it's about creating a more engaging and rewarding experience for everyone. The benefits are numerous:

  • Increased player engagement: When players feel like they have agency over their gameplay, they're more likely to stay engaged with the game. Letting them choose how they complete challenges shows that their preferences are valued.
  • More diverse gameplay: By not forcing players into specific modes, you encourage them to explore different aspects of the game. A player who primarily sticks to BR might try out the normal battlefield mode to complete a challenge, and vice versa. This can lead to discovering new strategies and playstyles, ultimately enriching the overall gameplay experience.
  • Reduced frustration and burnout: This one's a no-brainer. When players can complete challenges in a mode they enjoy, they're less likely to feel burnt out or frustrated with the game.
  • Healthier community: A happy player base is a healthy community. By catering to different playstyles and preferences, you create a more inclusive and welcoming environment for everyone.

The key takeaway here is that choice empowers players. It lets them tailor their experience to their liking, which leads to greater satisfaction and a more positive relationship with the game. This isn't just about making things easier; it's about making things better.

Designing Challenges with Choice in Mind

So, how do we design challenges that are doable in either BR or normal battlefield modes? It's not as difficult as it might seem. The key is to focus on objectives that are broadly applicable and can be achieved through different playstyles. Here are a few examples:

  • Generic weapon challenges: Instead of specifying a particular weapon, challenges could focus on weapon types (e.g., "Get 10 kills with assault rifles" or "Deal 500 damage with SMGs"). This allows players to use their preferred weapons within the mode they choose.
  • Objective-based challenges: Challenges that focus on completing objectives (e.g., "Capture 5 objectives" or "Revive 10 teammates") can be adapted to both BR and normal battlefield modes. In BR, this might involve capturing control points or reviving squadmates, while in normal modes, it could involve capturing flags or assisting teammates in objective areas.
  • General gameplay challenges: Challenges that focus on overall gameplay (e.g., "Play 5 matches" or "Get a top 10 finish") are inherently flexible and can be completed in any mode.
  • Adaptive challenges: Introduce challenges that dynamically adjust based on the mode being played. For example, a challenge that requires dealing damage could have different damage thresholds for BR and normal battlefield modes, reflecting the different gameplay dynamics.

The core principle is to think broadly. Avoid challenges that are too specific to a particular mode or playstyle. Focus on the underlying skills and objectives that are common to both BR and normal battlefield experiences. This approach not only gives players more choice but also encourages them to develop a wider range of skills.

The Importance of Clear Communication

Once you've designed challenges with choice in mind, it's crucial to communicate this clearly to the players. Make sure the challenge descriptions explicitly state that the challenge can be completed in either BR or normal battlefield modes. This eliminates confusion and ensures that players are aware of their options.

Furthermore, consider providing in-game tracking that shows progress separately for each mode. This allows players to easily monitor their progress and make informed decisions about where to focus their efforts. Clear communication is the key to a smooth and enjoyable experience for everyone.

Examples in Popular Games

Many popular games have already embraced the idea of giving players a choice in how they complete challenges. Let's take a look at a few examples:

  • Apex Legends: Apex Legends often features challenges that can be completed in either the Battle Royale mode or the Arenas mode. This gives players the flexibility to focus on the mode they enjoy most while still progressing through the challenges.
  • Call of Duty: Warzone/Multiplayer: Call of Duty games typically offer challenges that can be completed in either Warzone (the BR mode) or the traditional multiplayer modes. This allows players to tailor their experience to their preferred playstyle.
  • Fortnite: Fortnite's challenge system often includes a mix of challenges that can be completed in either the Battle Royale mode or the Save the World mode. This gives players even more options and caters to a wider range of preferences.

These examples demonstrate that giving players a choice in how they complete challenges is a proven strategy for increasing engagement and satisfaction. It's a win-win for both the players and the game developers.

Conclusion: Let's Embrace Player Choice

In conclusion, the idea that all challenges should be doable in either the BR or normal battlefield mode is not just a matter of convenience; it's a matter of respecting player choice and creating a more enjoyable gaming experience. By giving players the flexibility to complete challenges in their preferred mode, we can reduce frustration, increase engagement, and foster a healthier community. It's time to embrace player choice and design challenges that cater to a wider range of playstyles. Let's make games more fun for everyone!